Talk:C^ backflip: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, som...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? [[User:Bad boot|Bad boot]] ([[User talk:Bad boot|talk]]) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC) | I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? [[User:Bad boot|Bad boot]] ([[User talk:Bad boot|talk]]) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
::Old post, but I agree. [[User:Nim|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 17 April 2019
I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? Bad boot (talk) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)