Talk:C^ backflip: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (MMMMMMMMMMMMM moved page Talk:C^ Backflip to Talk:C^ backflip: sentence case manually due to annoying character) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Should this and similar TAS techniques be merged into [[Common TASing Techniques]]? == | == Should this and similar TAS techniques be merged into [[Common TASing Techniques]]? == | ||
title[[User:Nim|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC) | title [[User:Nim|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:32, 11 May 2021
I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? Bad boot (talk) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)